The National Academies of Sciences (NAS) released a much awaited report today, “Effective Monitoring to Evaluate Ecological Restoration in the Gulf of Mexico.” The report recommends a set of best practices for monitoring and evaluating restoration activities related to the Deepwater Horizon oil spill.

NAS writes in their report release, “The Natural Resource Damage Assessment (NRDA) Trustee Council, NASmonitoringreportthe Gulf Coast Ecosystem Restoration Council (RESTORE Council), and the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation (NFWF) are the largest restoration programs working toward the Gulf’s recovery after the 2010 offshore oil spill that led to a 20 percent reduction in commercial fisheries and damaged about 1,100 miles of coastal salt marsh wetlands. These programs administer a majority of the $16 billion available in restoration funds, supporting projects that range from coastal and offshore habitat restoration to recovery of certain species, water quality improvement, and land acquisition.

The report finds that the majority of past U.S. restoration efforts have not been adequately monitored to assess or improve restoration efficacy. To date, monitoring activities have been dramatically underfunded, and very few programs monitor environmental and social results. To ensure that progress of the efforts can be evaluated, the committee that conducted the study and wrote the report recommended that all restoration activities funded by these programs define specific, measurable objectives and adopt a rigorous statistical monitoring effort and a well-designed data management plan.”

Get the full NAS report release on their webpage.
Order a copy of the report from The National Academies Press.